An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws

An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws

Blog Article

If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is usually only done If your employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence as well as petitioner company responded to your allegations as such they were perfectly aware about the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to get seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the acquired counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession in the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer during the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this element for interim custody of the topic premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary to your determination of the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but aren't technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil law jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]

Therefore, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner should pursue his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If this kind of an appeal hasn't yet been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may possibly then seek further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more

Because the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be arrived at, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in the criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference here No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically bring about exoneration from departmental charges based about the same factual grounds. Though a writ under Article 199 is obtainable in specific limited situations, it can be generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full opportunity to cross-look at witnesses and present his/her defense but did not persuade the department of his/her innocence.

The law as founded in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling over the same kind of case.

The law of necessity recognized and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called law of necessity..

This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions would be the opinions that are filed over the working day that the appellate court issues its decision and are frequently not the court's final opinion.

Any court may well seek out to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to reach a different summary. The validity of this kind of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to some higher court.

171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be properly founded now that the provision for proforma promotion is just not alien or unfamiliar for the civil servant service structure however it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it can be lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority could if satisfied that a civil servant who was entitled to become promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his possess, wrongfully prevented from rendering service for the Federation/ province during the higher post, direct that these civil servant shall be paid the arrears of spend and allowances of these higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more

The acquired Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced through the findings in the Impugned order, after recording of evidence of your respective parties. Read more